Fabian Society: The Cardigan Files
Generally I find generational analyses of society to be worthless, and I sigh at the well-presented and pretty-coloured stacks of books with titles featuring the letters X and Y, and find my cynicism rising to world-weary despair when I find those books contain nothing pertaining either to chromosomes or Sesame Street. More than one bookshop employee has had to escort me quietly to the street, sobbing and asking ‘where’s Big Bird’?
Every now and then, though, I get a glimpse of the true nature of power as it’s manifested across the years, by a statum class of superannuated Baby Boomer crypto-fascists, informally exchanging information to ignore and consign to non-decisions any issue not affecting their concerns or worldview. It’s a true Death Star of rolled-up nylon cardigans, resin handmade brooches, sandalwood perfume and T2 shares.
How is it possible that Rodney Cavalier, Chairman (sic) of the SCG Trust and all-round unashamed élitist, can be made to look like a down-to-earth friend of the workers, free-thinker and pro-feminist? I don’t know how, but at the Fabian Society meeting held at Gleebooks on “Will John Howard win a fifth election? Or can Kim Beazley secure an ALP win?”, Paul Kelly, Hugh Mackay and Phillip Adams managed the feat with aplomb.
It was a quality event, in which the three speakers who I imagine ordinarily share no more politically in common than their various employers, all, united as one in a middle-class squeal, demanded that Labor acquiesce to the values and expectations of the professional, higher-educated and middle-aged upper bourgeoisie.
The Party doesn’t belong to you any more, and it never did. Political parties shouldn’t exist as vehicles for the delivery of beneficial feelings for the male dominated self-assured intelligentsia. Here’s a big loud wakeup call to the semi-elderly punditry: assertions of Labor’s insufficience may be fair, well earned or even empirically true, but reality will never be reflected in your demands of the Party. Sure, the ALP’s performance leaves a lot to be desired. Requirements, however, (I’m looking at you, Adams) for Labor to cave to the wishes of those who claim to have been betrayed by it are unlikely to be fulfilled.
Political action and change requires you to abandon your self-centred worldview, it’s as simple as that. You have to come to the Party rather than demanding the Party remake itself in your own greying image. So you wish that Keating was still PM? So you’d like Labor to make stands on the issues you care about? So you felt that Labor let you down over Tampa? My heart bleeds piss for you. The ALP is a lot more than you, chicko. To quote another bunch of self-important demanding middle-class white boys whose values and traditions were lifted thorougly and unacknowledged from the disenfranchised black people of their era, and who still won’t fuck off and retire to villas outside Chiang Mai despite their manifest past-it-ness:
You can’t always get what you want
But if you try sometimes…
You get what you need
And what you need, I don’t hesitate to assert in your faces, is a Labor Party and a universe that doesn’t cater to your whim, or even care particularly that you exist as a collective.
It’s a specific class and generational sense of entitlement designed to inhibit and prevent the participation or visibility of anybody else. Its practitioners par excellence are Phillip Adams himself, Malcolm Fraser and the part of the Liberal Party so breast-beatingly disenfranchised, the entire Australian literary and art scene despite the bollocking they took in Ganglands, and worst of all, Robert Walls, who can’t conceive of an Australian Football universe without him standing god-like at its centre, surrounded by fawning semi-naked acolytes reminiscing about his great Grand Final appearances. I piss on you all.
We’re coming to get you, baby boomers. As soon as your backs are turned or your hearing aid battery runs out, you’re getting packed off to the nursing home, to gerrymandered old-people electorates with caravan parks and ground-floor Centrelink offices, and to the grey ghettoes of Radio National, midday television and 2UE. Simultaneously.
And then, if you’re lucky, the rest of us will vote to fund the health services and social welfare which your overcatered and overindulged generation has run down through fixations on tax relief and individual accountability. Maybe. Better get to like the taste of catfood, just in case.

arleeshar wrote:
That’s all I gots. Do you ‘voice of our generation?’
Liam wrote:
Uh-uh arleeshar. You’re the voice, try and understand it.
Guy wrote:
Well someone’s worked up. :)
Have you read Ryan Heath’s book?
Liam wrote:
Guy, I own an autographed copy.
Amanda wrote:
It is manifest nonsense to say the Stones did not acknowlege their debt to the blues, their entire career has been doing just that. Every minute of the day. Nonsense, utter nonsense.
Neither can they be unifirmly described as middle class. Brian, definately upper class. Mick, lower middle with aspirations. Keef, working. Charlie, very much working class. Woody, if you are including him and why wouldn’t you, cockney working class. The bass player, comfy (lower) middle I think, but I’ll agree he’s a fuckwit.
If you can’t be trusted on something so important, why should I believe you on something so trivial as politics.
Ron wrote:
Just because your generation doesn’t have the guts to get out and make it on your own, don’t take it out on the older generations.
Your generation is perfectly summed by the current National Bank ad where a couple goes in for a housing loan but don’t have a deposit: they arrive at the bank in a $60,000 sports car.
Your $300 monthly mobile phone bills can go a long way towards mortgage payments.
Gen X & Y are a pack of envious, spendthrift whingers who want everything now and with the least amount of effort.
Oh … and get fucked.
Liam wrote:
Oh, don’t worry, Ron, I’ve got quite enough bile left over for those generational traitors young enough to be ignorant of the time before mobile telephony but old enough to sprocket out worthless super-subsidised hypernationalist offspring like so many unloved shit-brown staffie puppies. $60,000 sports cars? Yeah, I’ve seen them too, and if it weren’t a surprisingly difficult maneouvre at any speed, I’d piss on them from my pushbike.
Lleyton Hewitt, Jana Pittman, Nicole Pratt, and all of you self-righteous entitlement-minded rich young things? You think you’re role-models for the young now, but they’ll learn to despise you as you grow old, get caught cheating your sport’s anti-drug laws, and fiddling your tax. Look to Shane Warne, look really closely at the car crash of his life, and have a look at your future, all of it, down to the nasty ratty sordid details and the total lack of respect amongst anybody except the sociopathic and the severely deluded. That’s your future.
Aspirational? Not a valid form of self-identification, arseholes, not unless you’re a vacuum cleaner or a dental/medical suction tube.
jason wrote:
I thought you only spoke like that to me Liam???
Ron wrote:
Geez … Liam, did you get out of bed from the wrong side this morning?
To use one of the old baby-boomer sayings, ‘you sound like you really need a good root’ (for you youngsters: read that as ‘you really need to get laid’).
Ron wrote:
Actually, I just re-read your last comment and it reads more like a result of bad drugs! :-)
arleeshar wrote:
all this talk of roots and drugs, man, makes me want to get hair extensions and sandals and root myself silly with a silver fox. Make that two silver foxes at once. Upstairs at Gleebooks. I’ll seduce them with Satre. In a kaftan.
stoush? you want stoush? you got stoush? stoush. rant?
sssssttttoush. whatevs.
Liam wrote:
Thanks, arleeshar. Once again I’ve been educated by my comrades… and the urban dictionary.
EvilPundit wrote:
another bunch of self-important demanding middle-class white boys
Mmmmmm – racism, sexism and classism all in one neat package. Supplemented by ageism.
Truly, this post exemplifies all things Ledftist.
Liam wrote:
I presume Ledftist is a relative of Leadbelly?
EvilPundit wrote:
Yes, and Tdypfo.
Ron wrote:
You’re right: the ALP has lost its way (and my preference vote):
Labor could preference Family First
“LABOR could be looking at preferencing the conservative Family First party ahead of the Greens at next month’s state election in a bid to shore up support in marginal eastern suburbs seats.”
Why don’t the shits just all move over to the Liberals and be done with it? Bracks for the award of the country’s leading Liberal Party Premier with Iemma coming in second?
EvilPundit wrote:
Nah, they’re not good enough to be Liberals. Labor members are still too sexist and racist to be accepted into the fold of a civilised, enlightened party.
ryanheath wrote:
I just found your blog Liam - and about two seconds later was laughing my way out of my hangover. Spot on.
Did I tell you I love you?
Ryan
Post new comment